首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

信息网络视角下项目治理动态评价研究
引用本文:王磊,高少冲,丁荣贵,孙涛.信息网络视角下项目治理动态评价研究[J].科技进步与对策,2017,34(4):31-39.
作者姓名:王磊  高少冲  丁荣贵  孙涛
作者单位:山东大学 管理学院,山东 济南 250100
基金项目:国家自然科学基金项目(71572094);国家软科学重大研究计划项目(2013GXS5D199);山东省自然科学基金项目(ZR2015GM015);山东省社会科学基金项目(15CGLJ14);山东大学自主创新基金(人文社科专项)青年团队项目(2082014IFYT14007)
摘    要:项目治理通过明确利益相关方间关系形成治理网络,治理网络的信息维度(信息网络)表征相关方交互协作状态,是项目治理评价的主要方面。然而,当前一次性的、静态的网络评价方式难以适应网络随项目推进而动态变化的特点。从网络整体和关键节点两个方面设计网络动态评价指标,并以工业技术研究院协同创新项目为例,对不同阶段的网络进行动态分析。研究发现:信息网络密度较低,表明项目中缺乏统一的、标准的沟通机制;政府网络地位逐渐降低,难以充分保证项目公益性;企业作为项目需求方,其参与度在项目前期较低、后期逐渐提高,导致项目变更、返工较多;工研院网络地位逐渐低于项目经理,增加了委托代理风险发生的可能性。

关 键 词:项目治理  动态评价  信息网络  社会网络分析  协同创新  工业技术研究院  
收稿时间:2016-11-21

Research on Dynamic Evaluation of Project Governance under the Information Network Perspective
Wang Lei,Gao Shaochong,Ding Ronggui,Sun Tao.Research on Dynamic Evaluation of Project Governance under the Information Network Perspective[J].Science & Technology Progress and Policy,2017,34(4):31-39.
Authors:Wang Lei  Gao Shaochong  Ding Ronggui  Sun Tao
Institution:School of Management, Shandong University, Jinan 250100, China
Abstract:Project governance network is formed by the relationships and stakeholders which cleared through project governance. The information dimension of the governance network, which called information network, reflects the interactive and cooperative state between stakeholders and it is the main aspect of the project governance evaluation. However, the current one-off and static network evaluation method is difficult to adapt to the dynamic characteristic of the governance network which changes in the project life cycle. Therefore, design the network dynamic evaluation index from two aspects: the overall network and the key nodes. Choose a collaborative innovation project of Industry Technology Research Institute as an example to evaluate the information networks dynamically based on the project phrases. There are several findings: the density of information network is low, which means that the project lacks the unified communication mechanism; the status of government in the network is gradually reduced, so it's hard to fully ensure the public welfare of the project; the participation of the enterprise who is the project customer is low in the early phrase and improves gradually in the latter phrases, which leads to more changes and reworks in the project; and the status of project manager in the network is gradually higher than that of Industrial Technology Research Institute, which increases the principal-agent risk.
Keywords:Project Governance  Dynamic Evaluation  Information Network  Social Network Analysis  Collaborative Innovation  Industrial Technology Research Institute  
点击此处可从《科技进步与对策》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《科技进步与对策》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号