家族涉入调节下社会资本对企业创新的作用机制研究

基于社会资本相关研究的理论分析，重点探讨家族性社会资本与非家族性社会资本对企业创新的联合影响效应，以及这种联合效应是否强于家族性社会资本或非家族性社会资本个体效应。鉴于强大的控制联盟（即家族）的存在为组织环境中社会群体之间积极互惠影响创造了条件，还探讨了家族涉入在上述关系中的调节作用。运用偏最小二乘法（PLS）对318份调研问卷数据进行分析，结果表明：家族性社会资本与非家族性社会资本共同对家族企业创新产生积极影响，且联合影响效应优于家族性社会资本或非家族性社会资本的单一效应；家族控制对家族性社会资本和非家族性社会资本与企业创新的关系存在正向调节作用；代际参与对家族性社会资本和非家族性社会资本与企业创新的关系存在负向调节作用。

Mechanism of impact of social capital on family firm innovation with the moderation of family involvement

This research focuses on the joint effect of family social capital and non-family social capital on family firm innovation, and whether this joint effect is stronger than the individual effect of family social capital or non-family social capital, based on the theoretical insights from social capital related research. suggesting that the presence of a strong dominant coalition (family) creates the conditions for a positive reciprocal influence between social communities within an organizational setting. Our study also highlights the moderating effect of family involvement in these relationships. This study uses partial least squares (PLS) modeling in order to analyze the data of 318 survey questionnaires. The results show that different forms of internal social capital have complementary effects on innovation, based on the general view of resource complementarity. Family social capital and non-family social capital have a positive impact on family firm innovation, and the joint effect is better than the single effect of family social capital or non-family social capital; Family control (family ownership and family management) moderates the relationship between family social capital/non-family social capital and family firm innovation, the highest level of innovation is achieved when family and non-family SC and family control are high; Generational involvement moderates the relationship between family social capital/non-family social capital and family firm innovation, the highest level of innovation is achieved when family and non-family SC are high, while generational involvement is low. The research conclusion provides useful experience for improving the effectiveness of relationships within family firms.