首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Ritual legitimation, de-coupling and the budgetary process: managing organizational hypocrisies in a multinational company
Authors:Luis Fernandez-Revuelta Perez  Keith Robson
Institution:aUniversidad de Almeria, Departamento de Direccio@a3n y Gestio@a3n de Empresas, Can@a7ada de San Urbano s/n, Almeria, 04120, Spain.;bUMIST, Manchester School of Management, P.O. Box 88, Manchester, M60 1QD, U.K.
Abstract:The study of participation in the budgetary cycle has formed a prominent part of the research literature concerned with the budgetary process. More recently there has emerged a body of literature concerned with exploring the political and symbolic nature of the budgetary process. The paper reports upon the outcomes of an empirical study of the introduction of `budgetary participation' in a division of a European subsidiary of a large North American car manufacturer. We detail the long process of consultation and negotiation within the subsidiary, and between it and the European Headquarters. The study provides a revealing instance of the roles of formal budget participation as a ritual of control and legitimation without the substantive involvement of middle managers and suggested to us the introduction of de-coupling and organizational hypocrisy alongside the introduction of budget participation. The study pays close attention to the contingent effects of the wider political context of the division and the relationships between the division, its organizational context and organizational environment, and how this context played upon the budgetary process in the division. The outcomes that we analyse at `Delta' reflect the de-coupling strategies and organizational hypocrisies commonly found in public sector organizations. In this wider setting the corporation persists with the ritual of `tight' budget negotiation and target setting and apparent underachievement in performance. Yet we conclude that the complex technological and political context to the formation and siting of Delta continued and may continue to support its existence.$g0
Keywords:budgeting  participation  de-coupling  organizational hypocrisy  legitimation  @911  Introduction@21The study of participation in the budgetary cycle has formed a prominent part of the research literature concerned with the budgetary process since Argyris (1952) produced the first major empirical study of the effects of budget participation in organizations  And since then many researchers have attempted to account for  in organizational terms  the apparent `beneficial effects'  or otherwise  of budgets  through  for example  the theory of cognitive dissonance (Foran and DeCoster  1974) or psychological theories of motivation (Stedry  1967)  The assumption that the involvement of managers in the process of budget setting improves organizational control has both a long history and a powerful place among the theories that `practitioners espouse' (Argyris  1977)  $PIn contrast to much of the conventional model of budgetary control and decision making that underlies many studies of the productive efficiency of budgetary participation  more recently a body of literature concerned to explore the political and symbolic nature of the budgetary process has emerged (Covaleski and Dirsmith  1988  Brunsson  1989)  Following Argyris (1952) and Cyert and March (1963)  as we argue below  the budgetary process has long been explored in terms that stress its role in the exercise of power and the reproduction of relations of power: in short  budgeting has been conceived of as an aspect of an organizational  social and political `reality' that is constructed through social action  rather than viewed simply as a neutral or technical process of rational planning or decision-making  It is this conceptual approach that we apply in the course of this study  with particular reference to the politics of the process of budgetary participation in a study of the subsidiary of a multi-national company  We explore the context to the introduction of a new participative approach to budget setting and its implications and consequences for organizational hypocrisy (Brunsson  1989) during the first year of operation  $PThe paper reports upon an empirical study of the introduction of `budgetary participation' in a division of a European subsidiary of a large North American car manufacturer  We detail the long budget setting process of consultation and negotiation within the subsidiary  and between it and the European Headquarters as it provides a revealing instance of the roles of formal budget participation as a ritual of control and legitimation  The study suggested to us the introduction of organizational hypocrisy and de-coupling in the subsidiary alongside the new budget participation (Brunsson  1989  1993)  While in Argyris' terms our study could be seen to explore an example of pseudo-participation in the budgetary process  our study rather pays attention also to the contingent effects of the wider political context of the division and the relationships between the division  its organizational structure and organizational environment (in particular  the European headquarters and governmental agencies who contributed to the financing of the division)  We explore how this context played upon the budgetary process in the division (which in the paper is called Delta) and influenced the production of organizational hypocrisy in a budgetary context (Brunsson  1989)  $PIn the next section of the paper we survey relevant aspects of the literature on budgetary participation and outline the contribution of an organizational analysis of the issue  In doing so we pay particular attention to organizational theories of hypocrisy  legitimation  de-coupling and ritual  The succeeding section documents the empirical evidence gathered by the researchers  Finally  there is a theoretical analysis and conclusion  @912  Budgetary participation and organizational environments@21Accounting and `management control' textbooks have ceaselessly attempted to clarify the concepts of decision making and control  and to relate them to the operation of rational accounting techniques (cf  Anthony et al    1988  Emmanuel et al    1990)  In conventional terms accounting techniques have been affirmed as mechanisms for reconciling talk and action by programming decisions for the attainment of organizational control  Common assumptions as to the causal relationship between talk and action have corresponded to the norms of goal directed  rational decision theory  norms that accounting and other management techniques celebrate (Meyer  1983)  In this paper we draw upon the work of Brunsson in order to make sense of the somewhat complex relationship between the formulation of the budget  the views of those to whom the budget was intended to relate and the actions of the organizational members once the budget was set  2In short  what Brunsson (1989) has termed the prevalence of organizational hypocrisy  
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号