An Examination of Procedural Justice Principles in China and the U.S. |
| |
Authors: | Jasmine Tata Ping Ping Fu Rongxian Wu |
| |
Affiliation: | (1) Management Department, Loyola University Chicago, 820 North Michigan Avenue, Chicago, IL 60611, USA;(2) Department of Management, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong, People's Republic of China;(3) Psychology Department, Suzhou University, People's Republic of China |
| |
Abstract: | This paper examines procedural justice principles from a cultural perspective, and examines the relationships between three dimensions of national culture (uncertainty avoidance, societal emphasis on collectivism, and gender egalitarianism), three principles of procedural justice (consistency, social sensitivity, and account-giving), and judgments of fairness. The results suggest that culture can influence employees' perceptions of the fairness of procedural justice principles; different dimensions of national culture influence different principles of procedural justice. The principle of social sensitivity was perceived as fairer in collectivistic China than in individualistic U.S. In addition, differences between men and women in perceived fairness of account-giving were exaggerated in China (a culture low in gender egalitarianism) and attenuated in the U.S. (a culture high in gender egalitarianism). |
| |
Keywords: | culture procedural justice fairness |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|