首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Values and attitudes of the urban public towards peri-urban agricultural land
Institution:1. Melbourne Sustainable Society Institute, The University of Melbourne, 3010 Victoria, Australia;2. Australian Research Centre for Urban Ecology, Royal Botanic Gardens, Melbourne, C/o School of Botany, The University of Melbourne, 3010 Victoria, Australia;1. System for Analysis, Research and Training (START), 2000 Florida Ave., NW, Washington, DC 20009, USA;2. United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), Scientific Assessment, P.O. Box 47074, N.O.F. 3, Nairobi, Kenya;3. The Nature Conservancy, Worldwide Office, 4245 N. Fairfax Dr., Arlington, VA 22203, USA;1. Key Lab of Regional Sustainable Development and Modelling, Institute of Geographical Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 11A Road, Datun, Chaoyang, Beijing, 100101, China;2. David C. Lam Institute for East-West Studies, Hong Kong Baptist University, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong, China;1. Sostenipra Research Group (ICTA-IRTA-Inèdit; 2014 SGR 1412), Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology (ICTA; Unidad de excelencia «María de Maeztu» (MDM-2015-0552)), Z Building, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Campus UAB, 08193 Bellaterra, Barcelona, Spain;2. Inedit ecoinnovación e investigación ambiental S de RL de CV, Department of Ecoinnovation, Innovation and Digital Fabrication Hub (The HubLab), Merida, Yucatan, Mexico;3. Department of Anthropology Sciences, Autonomous University of Yucatan (UADY), km 1, Mérida-Tizimín Highway, Cholul, 97305 Mérida, Yucatán, Mexico;4. Department of Engineering, Autonomous University of Yucatan (UADY), Avenue Industrias no contaminantes s/n x Periférico norte, 150, Mérida, Yucatán, Mexico;5. Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology (ICTA; Unidad de excelencia «María de Maeztu» (MDM-2015-0552)), Z Building, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Campus UAB, 08193 Bellaterra, Barcelona, Spain;6. Department of Projects and Construction Engineering (DEPC), Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, BarcelonaTech., Diagonal 647, Ed. H, 08028, Barcelona, Spain;7. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering (DECA), Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (UPC-BarcelonaTech), Campus Nord, C/Jordi Girona 1–3, 08034 Barcelona, Spain;8. Institute for Sustainability Science and Technology (IS.UPC), Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (UPC-BarcelonaTech), Campus Nord, C/Jordi Girona 31, 08034 Barcelona, Spain;9. Department of Chemical, Biological and Environmental Engineering, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Campus UAB, 08193 Bellaterra, Barcelona, Spain;1. Lee-Ming Institute of Technology, Taishan District, New Taipei City 243, Taiwan;2. Department of Landscape Architecture and Urban Planning, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003, USA;3. Graduate Institute of Urban Planning, National Taipei University, Sanshia District, New Taipei City 237, Taiwan;1. School of Global, Urban and Social Studies, RMIT University, GPO Box 2476, Melbourne, 3001 Victoria, Australia;2. Australian Research Centre for Urban Ecology, Royal Botanic Gardens, Melbourne, C/o School of Botany, The University of Melbourne, 3010 Victoria, Australia
Abstract:Peri-urban agricultural landscapes around the world are undergoing rapid transformation due to urban expansion. While some landscape values are being protected by current land-use planning frameworks, we know little about the broader values and attitudes of the urban public shaping this transformation. The structure of the values assigned to peri-urban agricultural landscapes by residents of Melbourne, Australia was explored and related to stated landscape preferences and people's underlying values. Exploratory factor analysis was used to categorise assigned values in multifunctional, food and native biota groups, and stated preferences for photographs into four landscape categories: intensive landscapes, extensive landscapes, high tree cover and plantations. The structure of underlying personal values closely resembled other studies of environmental value orientations. Multiple regression analysis revealed that preferences for all landscape categories were predicted strongly by multifunctional assigned values. Significant relationships were also evident between all assigned value groups and the biospheric underlying value orientation. Attitudes towards residential development approaches were also related significantly to assigned but not underlying values. Assigned values appear therefore to mediate between underlying values and attitudes towards peri-urban landscapes. This research demonstrates that peri-urban agricultural landscapes are perceived as multifunctional systems by the urban public and are valued for a range of functions not typically included in land use policies. This study also suggests that in the context of rapid land use change, a variety of landscape types should be retained on the urban fringe for their benefit to the urban public, and synergies promoted between landscape functions.
Keywords:
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号