| 防止期货市场操纵:监管措施及其效率评价 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 毛小云. 防止期货市场操纵:监管措施及其效率评价[J]. 河北经贸大学学报, 2006, 27(1): 72-78 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 毛小云 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 上海财经大学,国际工商管理学院,上海,200439 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 三类不同防止市场操纵的监管措施的效率比较,表明事后防止措施是其中最有效率的方法,而合约设计尤其是交割条款的设计是它的一种非常有效的补充方法。但是结合中国实际,我们发现这两类有效率的措施或者使用不多,或者受到各类因素影响,没有发挥出应有的作用。为此我们对改善我国期货市场防止操纵的做法提出了一些建议。
|
| 关 键 词： | 防止操纵 监管措施 成本比较 |
| 文章编号： | 1007-2101(2006)01-0072-07 |
| 收稿时间： | 2005-09-14 |
| 修稿时间： | 2005-09-14 |
Preventing Manipulation in Future Market: Supervision Measures and Comment on their Efficiency |
| |
| MAO Xiao-yun. Preventing Manipulation in Future Market: Supervision Measures and Comment on their Efficiency[J]. Journal Of Hebei University Of Economics and Trade, 2006, 27(1): 72-78 |
| |
| Authors: | MAO Xiao-yun |
| |
| Abstract: | The comparison of three different supervision measures preventing market manipulation shows that post-event preventive measure is the most effective one while contract design,delivery clause design in particular,is an effective supplement measure.However,taking into account of China's real conditions,it is found that these two measures are either not put into frequent use or,due to various factors,not put into full use.Based on the analysis in this article,some suggestions have been proposed concerning how to improve the measures preventing manipulation in China's future market. |
| |
| Keywords: | preventing manipulation supervision measures cost comparison |
| 本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
