首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

基于套牢的开发商与承包商博弈分析
引用本文:郝利花,张静,杜德权.基于套牢的开发商与承包商博弈分析[J].技术经济与管理研究,2012(5):17-20.
作者姓名:郝利花  张静  杜德权
作者单位:1. 西华大学管理学院,四川成都610039;西南交通大学经济与管理学院,四川成都610031
2. 西华大学管理学院,四川成都,610039
基金项目:四川省重点学科“企业管理”建设项目资金资助,四川省工程管理特色专业建设资会资助
摘    要:通过引入不可证实性系数,分析了开发商与承包商的博弈过程,并且得出结论:当市场状况良好时,即使承包商采取套牢行为,开发商仍将投资房地产;如果开发商的可占用准租不足以支付承包商所侵占的利益,开发商将可能不再投资房地产.其中,事项的不可证实性使承包商有机会侵占开发商的利益,因此,减少事项的不可证实性可以最大化开发商的收益.垫资合同在很大程度上可以减轻承包商的套牢程度.但无论如何,合同的不完全性都难以解决,套牢是不可避免的存在的,但是只要开发商能够从中获取超额收益,其投资行为就是必然的.

关 键 词:建筑企业  施工合同  工程收益  施工项目

Game Analysis based on Hold-up Theory with Developer and Builder
HAO Li-hua , ZHANG Jing , DU De-quan.Game Analysis based on Hold-up Theory with Developer and Builder[J].Technoeconomics & Management Research,2012(5):17-20.
Authors:HAO Li-hua  ZHANG Jing  DU De-quan
Institution:1,2(1.Faculty of Management,Xihua University,Chengdu Sichuan 610039,China; 2.School of Economics and Business Administration,Southwest Jiaotong University,Chengdu Sichuan 610031,China)
Abstract:The article anglicized game theory in pperformances of the contract between developer and contractor,and concluded that: developer would choose investment in real estate although its appropriable quasi-rents having occupied by contractor for a large number of appropriable quasi-rents coming from Specific investments,but when Real Estate Market was so bad not to pay for benefit occupied by contractor,developer would not invest in real estate.Contractor get benefit from what can not be confirmed,so developer can raise himself benefit if he can reduce the not-verifiable extend.Contractor′s loaning resolves the hold-up problem to some extent.Contract was always not complete,and Hold-up was inevitable.Only obtaining excess return,developer will invest in real estate.
Keywords:Construction enterprise  Construction contract  Project income  Construction project
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号