首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


IRC Section 162(m) and the law of unintended consequences
Authors:Kenneth R Ferris  James S Wallace
Institution:a W.P. Carey School of Business, Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ, 85069-7100, United States
b The Peter F. Drucker and Masatoshi Ito Graduate, School of Management, Claremont Graduate University, Claremont, CA, 91711-6160, United States
Abstract:In 1993, Section 162(m) of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code was passed into law with the intent to reign in outsized executive compensation by eliminating the tax-deductibility of executive compensation above $1 million unless the excess compensation was performance-based. An unintended consequence of the legislation was that executives' total compensation actually increased in the post-1993 period, largely due to a dramatic increase in employee stock options. Employee stock options have unintended consequences of their own. The economic value of stock options may be influenced by executive decision-making when the options are valued using the Black-Scholes model or some variant thereof. Our findings suggests an unintended consequence that executives used their discretion to positively impact the performance-based component of their compensation through actions increasing share price volatility and reducing dividend yields, assumptions implicit in option valuation models.
Keywords:Section 162(m)  Employee stock option  Unintended consequence  Executive compensation  Dividend yield  Share price volatility
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号