反不正当竞争法控制模式评析

不正当竞争行为严重侵蚀着市场经济的肌体,因此,世界各国均采取严格的措施调控不正当竞争行为。西方各国一般采取司法控制模式,我国则采取了以行政控制为主、司法控制为辅的模式,两种模式各有其特征和利弊。除了这两种模式外,在当今“小政府、大社会”的氛围中,另辟蹊径社会中介组织控制模式亦是完善竞争控制模式的良策。因而我国不妨采取以司法控制为主、行政控制和社会中介组织控制为辅的综合控制模式。

Evaluation of anti unfair competition law''''s control mode

Marketing economy is hurt badly by unjust competition so that it induces strict control in different eountries. The Western Countries adopt judicial dominating approaches to control injustice competition, whereas China adopts administrative measures assisted by legal forces. Each pattern has its advantages and disadvantages, In the background of little government and big social, social intermediary organizations turn into an. other good approach for dominating unjust competition. Therefore. China should adopt synthetically legal forces assisted by administrative measures and social intermediary organizations mode.