首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Expert opinion versus expertise in forecasting
Authors:Philip Hans Franses  Michael McAleer  Rianne Legerstee†
Institution:Econometric Institute, Erasmus University Rotterdam, PO Box 1738, NL-3000 DR Rotterdam, The Netherlands;
Econometric Institute and Tinbergen Institute, Erasmus University Rotterdam, PO Box 1738, NL-3000 DR Rotterdam, The Netherlands
Abstract:Expert opinion is an opinion given by an expert, and it can have significant value in forecasting key policy variables in economics and finance. Expert forecasts can either be expert opinions, or forecasts based on an econometric model. An expert forecast that is based on an econometric model is replicable, and can be defined as a replicable expert forecast (REF), whereas an expert opinion that is not based on an econometric model can be defined as a non-replicable expert forecast (Non-REF). Both REF and Non-REF may be made available by an expert regarding a policy variable of interest. In this paper, we develop a model to generate REF, and compare REF with Non-REF. A method is presented to compare REF and Non-REF using efficient estimation methods, and a direct test of expertise on expert opinion is given. The latter serves the purpose of investigating whether expert adjustment improves the model-based forecasts. Illustrations for forecasting pharmaceutical stock keeping unit (SKUs), where the econometric model is of (variations of) the autoregressive integrated moving average model (ARIMA) type, show the relevance of the new methodology proposed in the paper. In particular, experts possess significant expertise, and expert forecasts are significant in explaining actual sales.
Keywords:direct test  efficient estimation  expert opinion  replicable expert forecasts  generated regressors  non-replicable expert forecasts
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号