首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Eliciting Willingness to Pay without Bias using Follow-up Certainty Statements: Comparisons between Probably/Definitely and a 10-point Certainty Scale
Authors:Glenn C Blomquist  Karen Blumenschein  Magnus Johannesson
Institution:(1) Department of Economics and Martin School of Public Policy and Administration, University of Kentucky, Gatton Business and Economics Building 335, Lexington, KY 40506-0034, USA;(2) College of Pharmacy and Martin School of Public Policy and Administration, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40536-0082, USA;(3) Department of Economics, Stockholm School of Economics, Box 6501, SE-113 83 Stockholm, Sweden
Abstract:Correction for hypothetical bias using follow up certainty questions often takes one of two forms: (1) two options, “definitely sure” and “probably sure”, or (2) a 10-point scale with 10 very certain. While both have been successful in eliminating hypothetical bias from estimates of WTP by calibrating based on the certainty of yes responses, little is known about the relationship between the two. The purpose of this paper is to compare the two using data from three field experiments in a private good, dichotomous choice format. We compare four types of yes responses that differ in the criterion used to determine if there is sufficient certainty for a hypothetical yes response to be considered a true yes response. We make several comparisons, but focus on determining which values on the 10-point scale give the same estimates of WTP as “definitely sure” hypothetical yeses and real yeses (actual purchases). Values that produce equivalence are near 10 on the certainty scale.
Keywords:Certainty statements  Contingent valuation  Field experiments  Hypothetical bias  Willingness to pay
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号