首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Does illiquidity matter in residential properties?
Authors:Soosung Hwang  Youngha Cho
Institution:1. Department of Economics, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, South Korea;2. Department of Real Estate and Construction, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, UK
Abstract:No, it does not, despite the general perception that illiquidity matters in real estate. As expected, our evidence shows that the illiquidity costs for the U.S. residential properties are large. The costs are equivalent to 12% of the total property returns on average, ranging from 9.5% to 29.5% of property prices depending on the illiquidity level and market conditions. However, when amortized by holding periods, monthly illiquidity costs are on average 0.08%, and illiquidity risk does not appear to be priced in residential properties; illiquid properties do not show higher returns than liquid properties. On the contrary, we find evidence of flight-to-quality in bull markets, that is, high-quality illiquid properties are preferred to low-quality liquid properties in buoyant markets. These results are in sharp contrast with those in equities and bonds where flight-to-liquidity has been reported when markets are in stress.
Keywords:Illiquidity costs  residential properties  flight to quality  flight to liquidity
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号