首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Progress in indicators to assess agricultural landscape valuation: how and what is measured at different levels of governance
Affiliation:1. Institute for Environment and Sustainability, Joint Research Centre, European Commission, TP 266, Via Fermi 2749, 21027 Ispra, Italy;2. ICAAM – Instituto de Ciências Agrárias e Ambientais Mediterrânicas, Universidade de Évora, Pólo da Mitra, Edifício Principal, Gabinete 203 – Apartado 94, 7002-774 Évora, Portugal;3. CESUR, Instituto Superior Técnico, Av. Rovisco Pais, 1049-001 Lisboa, Portugal;1. Institute for Sustainability Sciences, Agroscope, Reckenholzstrasse 191, 8046 Zurich, Switzerland;2. Institute of Agricultural Sciences, ETH Zurich, 8315 Lindau, Switzerland;1. Faculty of Computing, Engineering and Sciences, Staffordshire University, Leek Road, Stoke-on-Trent ST4 2DF, United Kingdom;2. ESRI (UK) Ltd, Millennium House, 65 Walton Street, Aylesbury HP21 7QG, United Kingdom;1. Research Institute of Organic Agriculture FiBL, Postfach 219, CH-5070 Frick, Switzerland;1. ICAAM, Instituto de Ciências Agrárias e Ambientais Mediterrânicas, Universidade de Évora, Apartado 94, 7006-554 Évora, Portugal;2. Joint Research Centre, European Commision Address, TP 270, Via Fermi 2759, Italy
Abstract:
Landscape is defined by the European Landscape Convention as “an area perceived by people, whose character is the result of the action and interaction of natural and/or human factors”. Many efforts have been devoted in addressing the core concepts on which this definition roots: perception and interaction of men and nature, but when coming to large (continental) scale assessments, the latter prevail on the former.This paper aims at presenting a framework for a measurable landscape awareness indicator as a key link to the public demand for a specific type of landscape: the agricultural landscape. This is a necessary effort to complement more physically based assessments, which include as well the impact of human activities on landscapes.The analysis is carried out at different levels of governance: EU and regional, using an example from the Alentejo region in Portugal and EU wide databases, and addresses conceptual and practical questions: what type of societal landscape awareness can be monitored and by whom (e.g., individuals, specific social groups, society as a whole); what are the landscape dimensions that should be assessed; what are the limitations imposed by data-related constraints. By applying the methodology to build composite indicators to map landscape societal awareness, the paper shows the regional and local meaning of indicator approaches developed at European level, presents developments for downscaling to regional level, while introducing the social component to support sound policy development for European rural landscapes.
Keywords:Rural landscape  Composite indicator  Societal valuation  Public good  Policy assessment
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号