首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Supported housing in global austerity: Local providers fears for the future in Gloucestershire,England
Institution:1. Institute of Agricultural Resources and Environment, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 50 Zhong Ling Street, Nanjng 210014, China;2. State Key Laboratory of Soil and Sustainable Agriculture, Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 71 Beijing road, Nanjing 210008, China;1. Department of Chemistry and Environmental Science, New Jersey Institute of Technology, University Heights, Newark, NJ 07102, USA;2. Department of Biosystems and Agricultural Engineering, Michigan State University, 225 Farrall Hall, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA;1. USDA Forest Service, Southern Research Station, 1710 Research Center Drive, Blacksburg, VA, 24060, USA;2. USDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station, Durham, NH, USA;3. USDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station, St. Paul, MN, USA
Abstract:Shelter is a key component of an individual’s well-being and as a consequence is an area of policy development that cuts across national policies including welfare, health and social. Supported housing is a sub-set of the wider category of social housing, offering support services intended to help people with a range of challenges live as independently as possible. This paper is based on case study research in an English county that has a diverse range of rural and urban contexts. The analysis draws on evidence gathered mainly from interviews with decision-makers representing the largest supported housing providers in the region across a range of specialisms and needs provision. The research demonstrates that supported housing professionals have a range of concerns for the future of supported housing provision. Respondents reported that reforms to welfare payments and funding of housing support is creating great concern for the organisations and the fracturing of services meant it was increasingly difficult to offer comprehensive coverage in the county. However, the housing professionals also discussed a range of innovative and entrepreneurial responses to these uncertainties. This paper concludes that on the one hand there is a real and pressing threat of increased residualisation within the sector and within services for these most vulnerable groups reduced in both their scope and coverage. While on the other hand, those organisations able to operate more flexibly, and who were communicating effectively with local authorities, felt they had the best chance to respond to uncertainty in the policy landscape.
Keywords:Supported housing  Uncertainty  Austerity  Residualisation
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号