首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Behavior based price personalization under vertical product differentiation
Institution:1. University of Milano, Department of Economics, Management, and Quantitative Methods Via Conservatorio, 7, Milano 20122, Italy;2. Aix-Marseille Univ., CNRS, EHESS, Centrale Marseille AMSE, France;3. CEF.UP, University of Porto, Portugal;1. Bucknell University, United States;2. Texas Tech University, United States;1. WHU – Otto Beisheim School of Management, Chair of Organizational Theory, Burgplatz 2, Vallendar 56179, Germany;2. Ulm University of Applied Sciences, Faculty of Mathematics, Natural and Economic Sciences, Prittwitzstr. 10, Ulm 89075, Germany;3. WHU – Otto Beisheim School of Management, Burgplatz 2, Vallendar 56179, Germany;1. Toulouse School of Economics, Esplanade de l’Université 1, Toulouse 31080, France;3. Department of Economics and Business, University of Catania, C.so Italia 55, Catania 95129, Italy;4. Department of Economics and Related Studies, University of York, Heslington, York YO10 5DD, UK;5. Department of Economics/NIPE, University of Minho, Campus de Gualtar, Braga 4710-057, Portugal;6. Department of Economics, University of Bergen, Norway;1. Lancaster University Management School, United Kingdom;2. Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Germany
Abstract:We study price personalization in a two period duopoly with vertically differentiated products. In the second period, a firm not only knows the purchase history of all customers, as in standard Behavior Based Price Discrimination models, but it also collects detailed information on its old customers, using it to engage in price personalization. The analysis reveals that there exists a natural market for each firm, defined as the set of customers that cannot be poached by the rival in the second period. The equilibrium is unique, except when firms are ex-ante almost identical. In equilibrium, only the firm with the largest natural market poaches customers from the rival. This firm has highest profits but not necessarily the largest market share. Aggregate profits are lower than under uniform pricing. All consumers gain, total welfare is higher herein than under uniform pricing if firms’ natural markets are sufficiently asymmetric. The low quality firm chooses the minimal quality level and a quality differential arises, though the exact choice for the high quality depends upon the cost specification.
Keywords:
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号