将来给付之诉之“预先判决的必要”探析

大陆法系的民事诉讼法理论中，与确认之诉、形成之诉并为民事之诉三大类型的给付之诉可进一步划分为现在给付之诉和将来给付之诉。将来给付之诉揭示了在给付请求权尚未届依法行使之时，原告的诉讼请求有必要通过裁判的方式予以救济这一现实困境与立法盲点交叠下诉权理论延伸的现实可能性。将来给付之诉的诉讼标的、诉的利益以及将来给付之诉下权利生成的途径论证其必要性及价值归属等多维度分析，联系扩大司法救济范围，为保护当事人合法权益提供更加有力的理论依据。

Preliminary Research of the Prejudgment Necessity of Action for Future Presentation

The action of performance can be divided into two types, now prestation and action for future prestation, which is connected with the interest of action tightly. Action for future prestation reflects a possibility that the right of action is expected to enrich and expand for the plaintiff＇s expectation interest can be practiced by the way of judicial remedy, although these prestation subjected to stipulated time limit or condition limit will not be admitted according to law until the end of oral debate. There are three aspects, the subject matter, interest of litigation as weU as the generation of rights, in the paper except for argument the necessity and value of the action for future prestation. Trying to expand the coverage of judicial remedy, to protect the legitimate rights and interests of the parties to provide a more powerful theoretical basis.