首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Democracy,sustainability and dialogic accounting technologies: Taking pluralism seriously
Authors:Judy Brown
Institution:1. University of Tampere, Faculty of Management, FI-33014 University of Tampere, Finland;1. The School of Management, The University of St Andrews, North Haugh, St Andrews, KY16 9RJ, Scotland, United Kingdom;2. The Department of Accounting, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, United Kingdom;1. School of Accountancy, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), 2 George St, Brisbane, Qld 4000, Australia;2. Australian Centre for Philanthropy and Nonprofit Studies, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), 2 George St, Brisbane, Qld 4000, Australia;3. Department of Accounting, Finance and Economics, Griffith University, Parklands Drive, Southport, Qld 4215, Australia;4. Academic Quality Unit, University of Southern Queensland, West St, Toowoomba, Qld 4350, Australia;1. University of Canterbury, University Drive, Ilam, Christchurch 8041, New Zealand;2. Sheffield University Management School, Conduit Road, Sheffield S10 1FL, UK;3. University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TY, UK;1. Adam Smith Business School, University of Glasgow, University Avenue, Glasgow, G12 8QQ, Scotland, UK;2. Sheffield University Management School, University of Sheffield, Crookesmoor Building, Conduit Road, Sheffield S10 1FL, England, UK
Abstract:There is wide-ranging recognition of the need for “new accountings” that foster democracy and facilitate more participatory forms of social organization. This is particularly evident in the sustainable development and social and environmental accounting literatures, with calls for more dialogic forms of accounting. However, there has been very little consideration of how “democracy” should be approached; and, in particular, the implications of any particular model of democracy for the kinds of accounting technologies that might be advocated. This paper seeks to contribute to the theoretical development of dialogic accounting and focuses on the sustainability arena for illustrative purposes. It draws on debates between deliberative and agonistic democrats in contemporary political theory to argue the case for an agonistic approach to dialogics; one that respects difference and takes interpretive and ideological conflicts seriously. In recognition of the ways in which power intrudes in social relations so as to deny heterogeneity and privilege certain voices, it seeks to promote a broadly critical pluralist approach. To this end, the paper proposes a set of key principles for dialogic accounting and draws on ecological economist Peter Söderbaum’s work on positional analysis applied to an existing accounting tool – the Sustainability Assessment Model (SAM) – to illustrate how such an approach might be operationalized. The paper also discusses limitations of the dialogic accounting concept and impediments to its implementation.
Keywords:
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号