首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Synthesis of Complex Criteria Decision Making: A Case Towards a Consensus Agreement for a Middle East Conflict Resolution
Authors:Jerry Zoffer  Asma Bahurmoz  Mohammed K Hamid  Marcel Minutolo  Thomas Saaty
Institution:(1) University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA;(2) King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia;(3) Millersville University, Millersville, PA, USA
Abstract:The title of this paper reflects both the process and the outcome of the current undertaking. Frustrated with the current state of the Middle East but encouraged by earlier attempts at modeling complex problems, the authors participated in a panel discussion assembled to address the conflict and propose a possible road-map to peace. However, the participants of this project did not come to a single course of action that will result in peace in the Middle East but did reach a consensus agreement about a resolution that needs to be managed. This paper explores the process, the outcome and the factors that influence the decision as well as potential pitfalls. The Analytic Network Process (ANP), a well known multicriteria decision making approach, applied frequently in recent years to examine conflicts around the world, is used in this analysis. It provides a framework for synthesizing judgments on the diverse aspects of the problem represented in the structure of the decision. It pieces together these judgments in a holistic and logical way.
Keywords:Analytic Network Process  Middle East  Multicriteria decision making  Conflict resolution  Peace road map  Israeli Palestinian dilemma
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号