首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Integrating decentralised land administration systems with traditional land governance institutions in Ghana: Policy and praxis
Institution:1. Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Utrecht University, PO Box 80115, 3508TC Utrecht, The Netherlands;2. ActionAid-Mozambique, Rua Comandante João Belo 208, Maputo, Mozambique;3. ActionAid-Nederland, Stadhouderskade 60, 1072 AC Amsterdam, The Netherlands;1. Department of Geography, Ghent University, Belgium;2. Department of Management, Mekelle University, P.O. Box 451, Mekelle, Ethiopia;3. Centre for Environmental Sciences, Hasselt University, Agoralaan Building D, 3590 Diepenbeek, Belgium;4. Department of LaRMEP, Mekelle University, P.O. Box 231, Mekelle, Ethiopia;1. RMIT University, School of Mathematical and Geospatial Sciences, GPO Box 2476?V, Melbourne, Australia;2. Aalborg University, Department of Development and Planning, Fibigerstraede 11, DK-9220 Aalborg, Denmark;3. University of Twente, Geoinformation Science and Earth Observation, Hengelose straat 99, Enschede, The Netherlands;1. Department of Economic and Technological Change, Centre for Development Research (ZEF), University of Bonn, Germany;2. Department of Political and Cultural Change, Centre for Development Research (ZEF), University of Bonn, Germany;3. Department of Real Estate and Land Management, University for Development Studies (UDS), Wa - Campus, Ghana
Abstract:The aim of the Land Administration Project (LAP) policy reform for supporting the establishment of the Customary Land Secretariats (CLSs) is to formalise and strengthen customary land administration and management within the context of decentralised land administration. With the prospects of the CLSs becoming the legal local land administrative units, the paper assessed how traditional land governance institutions may have contributed to the decentralisation of land administration in Ghana. The research used case study strategy within the qualitative research paradigm and un-structured questionnaires were used to collect data. The analyses show that, simple land registries exist with traditional local governance institutions through the CLSs. The maintenance and effectiveness of this however depends on continuous improvement of records keeping, quality of office personnel and suitable office accommodation. This should be devoid of local power struggles among current and successive chiefs. Also, collaboration with public land sector agencies especially in areas of sharing information on rights, uses, disputes and preparation of planning layouts is paramount. These registries are mere extension of the state land administration apparatus as service units under the deconcentration of land administration powers. The paper concludes that the current policy focus on strengthening decentralised land administration through the CLSs may fail if attention is not given to the maintenance of the local registries. Revenue generation capacities of the CLSs need to be enhanced in order for them to recruit and maintain quality office staff, and acquire technical logistics. Decentralising land administration to the CLSs under the deconcentration of powers should be maintained in the interim because of the teething problems identified with this current system.
Keywords:Customary Land Secretariat  Decentralisation land administration  Traditional land governance  Local land registries  Technical capacity
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号