首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


An evaluation framework for earthquake-responsive land administration
Institution:1. Geospatial Science, School of Science, RMIT University, GPO Box 2476V, Melbourne, Australia;2. Geospatial Science, School of Science, RMIT University, Melbourne, Australia;3. Deputy Minister’s Office, Quebec, Canada;4. Survey Department, Ministry of Land Reform and Management, Kathmandu, Nepal;5. Quebec, Canada;1. Department of Geospatial and Space Technology, University of Nairobi, P.O. Box 30197, 00100 Nairobi, Kenya;2. Transportation and Geo-Information Engineering, Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Technion ? Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa 32000, Israel;1. Mobile Communication Research Center, LG Electronics, 219-24 Gasan-dong, Geumcheon-gu, Seoul 153-801, Republic of Korea;2. School of Computer Science & Engineering, Soongsil University, 369 Sangdo-Ro, Dongjak-Gu, Seoul 156-743, Republic of Korea;3. School of Computer Science and Engineering, Seoul National University, 599 Kwanak-ro, Kwanak-gu, Seoul 151-742, Republic of Korea;1. University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, Austria;2. Bureau of Environmental Protection, Land Administration and Use (BoEPLAU), Bahir Dar, Ethiopia
Abstract:In recent years earthquakes and their secondary hazards have claimed the largest number of lives of all large natural disasters. Some of the world’s most earthquake-prone zones are also areas of high population density. The impact is magnified by vulnerability factors including non-enforcement of building codes, knowledge gaps, urban poverty and poor governance capacity to manage and reduce earthquake risks. Poor security of land tenure and property rights increases the vulnerability of people and affects their ability to respond to natural disasters.Earthquake recovery and reconstruction provides very significant challenges for land agencies, with these challenges differing from one country to the next due to differences in the local context. Drawing on contrasting case studies in Haiti, Nepal and New Zealand this paper identifies the common post-earthquake land administration functions and challenges that may apply to many contexts. These lessons provide land agencies and other key stakeholders with a summary of the challenges an earthquake poses for land administration at different post-disaster stages. We also discuss the policy and regulatory, institutional, operational and preparedness lessons for land administration. From these lessons we propose a framework for evaluating the earthquake-responsiveness of a land administration system. This framework can be used by a land agency in an earthquake prone region, or where an earthquake has recently occurred, to assess what challenges to land administration might occur in the event of an earthquake, and the preparedness of their land administration system.
Keywords:Earthquake  Risk  Response  Recovery  Reconstruction  Land administration  Land governance  Land information  Vulnerability  Preparedness  Mitigation  Evaluation framework  Haiti  Nepal  New Zealand
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号