首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Playing musical chairs with land use obligations: Market-based instruments and environmental public policies in Brazil
Institution:1. Área de la Cadena Agroalimentaria, Grupo Agroecosost, IFAPA, Camino de Purchil s/n, Granada, Spain;2. Área de la Cadena Agroalimentaria, IFAPA, Carretera Bailén-Motril, Mengibar, Jaén, Spain;1. NOAA Large Marine Ecosystems Program, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Marine Fisheries Service Laboratory, Narragansett, RI, USA;2. Centro Interdisciplinario de Investigaciones y Estudios sobre Medio Ambiente y Desarrollo, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, México;3. Consorcio de Instituciones de Investigación Marina del Golfo de México y el Caribe (CiiMAR-GoMC), México;1. School of Resource and Environmental Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430079, China;2. Key Laboratory of Geographic Information System, Ministry of Education, Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430079, China;3. Collaborative Innovation Center for Geospatial Information Science, Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430079, China;4. Department of Urban Planning and Design, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong;1. Faculty of Architecture and the Built Environment, Department OTB, Delft University of Technology, PO Box 5043, 2600 GA, Delft, The Netherlands;2. Faculty of Law, VU University Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1105, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands;3. Property lawyer at the Port of Rotterdam, The Netherlands
Abstract:In Brazil, market-based instruments focusing on land use dimensions are increasingly promoted as a means to make public environmental policies effective. Landowners and farmers call for more flexible regulations and economic incentives to adopt ecologically sound practices, while public agencies and conservation NGOs seek new ways of financing and legitimising legal standards. Market-based instruments are considered by these actors as having the potential to both achieve their own goals and conciliate all interests. As a result, legal frameworks (including cap-and-trade systems, biodiversity offsetting and payments for ecosystem services) are being designed which allow to exchange land use rights and obligations. Under a sociolegal approach, this article provides an overview of such instruments. It shows to what extent they may entail a reconfiguration of the burden sharing and the priority setting of nature conservation. Depending on how actors use legal standards, their responsibilities may be eased and the level of conservation may be lowered, both facts that raise significant controversy.
Keywords:Nature conservation  Forest management  Environmental law  Payment for ecosystem services  Economic incentives  Biodiversity offsets
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号