A Monopolist Would Still Charge More for Windows: A Comment on Werden's Reply |
| |
Authors: | Reddy Bernard Evans David Nichols Albert Schmalensee Richard |
| |
Affiliation: | (1) NERA, 1 Main Street, Cambridge, MA, 02142, U.S.A;(2) loan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, USA |
| |
Abstract: | Werden's reply to our comment does nothing to cast doubt on our fundamental conclusion: Microsoft's pricing of Windows is inconsistent with thegovernment's claim that Windows is a monopoly, protected by high entry barriers. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|