首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


A Monopolist Would Still Charge More for Windows: A Comment on Werden's Reply
Authors:Reddy  Bernard  Evans  David  Nichols  Albert  Schmalensee  Richard
Affiliation:(1) NERA, 1 Main Street, Cambridge, MA, 02142, U.S.A;(2) loan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, USA
Abstract:
Werden's reply to our comment does nothing to cast doubt on our fundamental conclusion: Microsoft's pricing of Windows is inconsistent with thegovernment's claim that Windows is a monopoly, protected by high entry barriers.
Keywords:
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号