首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

中国引咎辞职问题研究述评
引用本文:戴木茅.中国引咎辞职问题研究述评[J].陕西省行政学院陕西省经济管理干部学院学报,2011(4):56-58.
作者姓名:戴木茅
作者单位:北京大学政府管理学院,北京100871
摘    要:从2000年至今,伴随着中央和地方政府对引咎辞职相关规定的出台,学界对这一问题的研究也出现了两次高潮。无论是从政治学角度还是从行政法学角度,研究文章大多依照"问题——应对"模式,即先说明什么是引咎辞职,再阐述中国建立引咎辞职面临哪些困难,最后再提出一些制度设计上的建议。但是研究中也表现出理论依据不足、对引咎辞职定位模糊、忽略引咎辞职后果等问题,这些不足需要在今后的研究中加以注意。

关 键 词:引咎辞职  问责制  制度建设

A Review of "Accepting Responsibility and Resigning" Research in China
DAI Mu-mao.A Review of "Accepting Responsibility and Resigning" Research in China[J].Journal of Shaanxi Administration School and Shaanxi Economic Management School,2011(4):56-58.
Authors:DAI Mu-mao
Institution:DAI Mu-mao(School of Government,Peking University,Beijing 100871,China)
Abstract:Since 2000,along with the setting up of regulations and laws of culpability by central and local governments,scholars have done a great deal of research on the subject of "accepting responsibility and resigning"(yinjiu cizhi).Scholarly interest was particularly high at two moments.Regardless of the researchers' political views or their attitudes towards administrative law,most research follows a "problem——resolution" model,i.e.they define culpability first,and then they analyze what the problem is in China and then finally offer some solutions.In these researches,some weak points reveal themselves,for example,they lack theoretical foundations,they are unclear about whether solutions should be legal or moral,and do not address post-resignation issues.More attention should be paid to those problems in later research.
Keywords:accepting responsibility and resign  accountability  system constructio
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号