首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Integrated assessment of water framework directive nitrate reduction measures
Authors:Carlo Fezzi  Michael Hutchins  Dan Rigby  Ian J Bateman  Paulette Posen  David Hadley
Institution:1. CSERGE, School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, NR4 7TJ, UK;2. Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Crowmarsh Gifford, Wallingford, OX10 8BB, UK;3. Department of Economics, School of Social Sciences, University of Manchester, M13 9PL, UK;4. Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of Western Australia, Perth and the Department of Economics, Waikato University, Hillcrest, 3216 New Zealand
Abstract:This article illustrates a statistical approach for deriving farm economic impacts of policy options aiming to reduce nitrate diffuse pollution. Building upon Fezzi et al. (2008) , who assess the costs of Water Framework Directive‐related measures on farm accounts data, we estimate regression models allowing such costs to be predicted for any region for which land use patterns and livestock numbers are known. We derive economic impacts in terms of changes in farm gross margin for (a) reducing inorganic fertilizer application, (b) reducing livestock stocking rates, and (c) converting arable land to ungrazed grassland. A case study of the agriculturally diverse Yorkshire Derwent catchment, in the North of England, demonstrates the overall approach. In addition, for this illustration, we combine these cost estimates with prediction of the water quality changes arising from each measure, derived via an integrated hydrological model of the Derwent. This allows a comparison of cost‐effectiveness. Finally, we implement our spatially explicit approach to target the measures to specific subcatchments identified as being of particular environmental policy interest.
Keywords:Q15  Q25  Q53  Integrated assessment  Water framework directive  Diffuse pollution  Nitrates  Cost‐effectiveness
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号