首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Alignment of performance measurement to sustainability objectives: A variance-based framework
Authors:Saurav K Dutta  Raef A Lawson  David J Marcinko
Institution:1. University at Albany, SUNY, Albany, NY 12222, United States;2. Institute of Management Accountants, Montvale, NJ 07645, United States;3. Skidmore College, Saratoga Springs, NY 12866, United States;1. John Cook School of Business, Saint Louis University, United States;2. Mays Business School, Texas A&M University, United States;3. School of Business, American University in Cairo, Egypt;1. Colorado State University, United States;2. Fordham University, United States;3. University of Connecticut, United States;1. University of Hong Kong, Faculty of Business and Economics, Pokfulam Road, Hong Kong;2. Beijing University, National School of Development/CCER, Beijing, China;3. City University of Hong Kong, Department of Accountancy, Tat Chee Avenue, Hong Kong;1. University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy;2. Kaunas University of Technology, K. Donelai?io g. 73, LT-44029 Kaunas, Lithuania;1. University of Amsterdam Business School, The Netherlands;2. School of Management, Royal Holloway, University of London, England, United Kingdom;1. Aalto University, School of Business, Department of Accounting, P.O. Box 21220, FI-00076 Aalto, Finland;2. Aalto University, School of Engineering, Department of Energy Technology, P.O. Box 14100, FI-00076 Aalto, Finland
Abstract:Meaningful incorporation of environmental and social responsibility goals into organizational strategic plans requires a mechanism to measure and reward performance contributing to that objective. This paper formulates such a framework using management accounting concepts. We demonstrate that the benefits of pursuing sustainability objectives can be decomposed into three parts. The first consists of what might be considered a natural outcome of pursuing the traditional economic goal of efficiency through cost-minimization (a “waste” variance). The second part consists of sustainability gains that produce societal benefit but may be incongruent with short-term economic goals (a “sustainability” variance). The third part stems from a change in optimal output level when that is considered endogenous to the firm (a “volume” variance). While elimination of waste variances can be encouraged using a traditional performance evaluation and reward structure, elimination of sustainability and volume variances requires redesign of performance evaluation tools and reward structures. We demonstrate that failure to recognize and incorporate the difference between the three variances can lead to inefficient allocation of resources, over- or under-production, and only partial fulfillment of environmental goals. Further, availability of shadow price information is essential to implementing such a performance measurement system; thus it is a public policy imperative to develop markets that establish such prices.
Keywords:
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号