The information content of Australian credit ratings: A comparison between subscription and non-subscription-based credit rating agencies |
| |
Authors: | Pak To Chan Vic Edwards Terry Walter |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. University of Hong Kong, Faculty of Business, School of Economics and Finance, No. 1, Pokfulam Road, Hong Kong;2. University of New South Wales, Australian School of Business, NSW 2052, Australia;3. UTS, School of Finance and Economics, NSW 2007, Australia |
| |
Abstract: | We classify credit rating agencies into two groups: subscribing and non-subscribing. Investors can access (non-subscribing) credit reports released to the public for no charge, or investors can subscribe to the fee-paying (subscribing) credit reports from agencies. Our results suggest that the information content of non-subscribing credit agencies is very low, whereas positive excess returns exist up to eight months after the announcement of credit upgrades from the subscription-only agencies. We support the hypothesis proposed in Grossman and Stiglitz [Grossman, S.J., Stiglitz, J.E., 1976. Information and competitive price systems. The American Economic Review 66, 246–253; Grossman, S.J., Stiglitz, J.E., 1980. On the impossibility of informationally efficient markets. The American Economic Review 70, 393–408]. Investors who spend resources on information acquisition should receive compensation for their information advantage, or there would be no incentive for such activity. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|