首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


The information content of Australian credit ratings: A comparison between subscription and non-subscription-based credit rating agencies
Authors:Pak To Chan  Vic Edwards  Terry Walter
Affiliation:1. University of Hong Kong, Faculty of Business, School of Economics and Finance, No. 1, Pokfulam Road, Hong Kong;2. University of New South Wales, Australian School of Business, NSW 2052, Australia;3. UTS, School of Finance and Economics, NSW 2007, Australia
Abstract:We classify credit rating agencies into two groups: subscribing and non-subscribing. Investors can access (non-subscribing) credit reports released to the public for no charge, or investors can subscribe to the fee-paying (subscribing) credit reports from agencies. Our results suggest that the information content of non-subscribing credit agencies is very low, whereas positive excess returns exist up to eight months after the announcement of credit upgrades from the subscription-only agencies. We support the hypothesis proposed in Grossman and Stiglitz [Grossman, S.J., Stiglitz, J.E., 1976. Information and competitive price systems. The American Economic Review 66, 246–253; Grossman, S.J., Stiglitz, J.E., 1980. On the impossibility of informationally efficient markets. The American Economic Review 70, 393–408]. Investors who spend resources on information acquisition should receive compensation for their information advantage, or there would be no incentive for such activity.
Keywords:
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号