|
|||||
|
|
| 波普历史非决定论思想的证立逻辑及其批判 | |
| 引用本文： | 赵庆元,姜惠莉. 波普历史非决定论思想的证立逻辑及其批判[J]. 石家庄经济学院学报, 2008, 31(3): 119-123 |
| 作者姓名： | 赵庆元 姜惠莉 |
| 作者单位： | 1. 石家庄经济学院人文社会科学学院,河北石家庄,050031 2. 河北师范大学学报编辑部,河北石家庄,050016 |
| 基金项目： | 河北省哲学社会科学基金 |
| 摘 要： | 波普以证伪主义科学知识增长模式为逻辑支柱的历史非决定论思想是现代西方历史哲学中独具特色的一支。通过对猜测一反驳方法极端否定证实的逻辑学分析和对科学知识内在规律的科学揭示，深刻地批判了波普的历史非决定论思想，说明了历史决定论的深刻基础只能是人们的“实际生活过程”。 |
| 关 键 词： | 波普 历史非决定论 科学知识增长模式 历史决定论 |
| 文章编号： | 1007-6875(2008)03-0119-05 |
| 修稿时间： | 2007-12-23 |
On the Logic of Argumentation and its Criticism of Karl Popper's Non-Historicism |
|
| ZHAO Qing-yuan,JIANG Hui-li. On the Logic of Argumentation and its Criticism of Karl Popper's Non-Historicism[J]. Journal of Shijiazhuang University of Economics, 2008, 31(3): 119-123 | |
| Authors: | ZHAO Qing-yuan JIANG Hui-li |
| Affiliation: | ZHAO Qing-yuan1,JIANG Hui-li2(1.Shijiazhuang University of Economics,Shijiazhuang,Hebei 050031,2.Hebei Normal University,Hebei 050016) |
| Abstract: | Popper＇s non-historicism is a specific branch of western philosophy, which is logically based on the increasing mode of science of Falsificationism. In this thesis, Popper＇s Non-Historicism is criticized through the logical analysis of Conjectures-Refutations, extreme negative Verification and the revelation of the inner law of science. It is considered that the unique foundation of Historicism is the real life process. |
| Keywords: | Karl Popper Non-Historicism the increasing mode of science |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ | |