首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Beware of ‘Good’ Outliers and Overoptimistic Conclusions*
Authors:Catherine Dehon  Marjorie Gassner  Vincenzo Verardi
Affiliation:1. ECARES and CKE, Université Libre de Bruxelles, B‐1050 Brussels, Belgium
(e‐mail: cdehon@ulb.ac.be;2. mgassner@ulb.ac.be);3. CRED, University of Namur, B‐5000 Namur, Belgium (e‐mail: vverardi@ulb.ac.be);4. ECARES and CKE, Université Libre de Bruxelles, B‐1050 Brussels, Belgium
(e‐mail: cdehon@ulb.ac.be
Abstract:The main goal of this paper is to warn practitioners of the danger of neglecting outliers in regression analysis, in particular, good leverage points (i.e. points lying close to the regression hyperplane but outlying in the x‐dimension). While the types of outliers which do influence regression estimates (vertical outliers and bad leverage points) have been extensively investigated, good leverage points have been largely ignored, probably because they do not affect the estimated regression parameters. However, their effect on inference is far from negligible. We propose a step‐by‐step procedure to identify and treat all types of outliers. The paper of Persson and Tabellini [American Economic Review (2004) Vol. 94, pp. 25–46] linking the degree of proportionality of an electoral system to the size of government is discussed to illustrate how the choice of a measure and the existence of atypical observations may substantially influence results.
Keywords:C12  C21  H11
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号