首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

外商直接投资对中国技术进步效应的结构分析
引用本文:田素华.外商直接投资对中国技术进步效应的结构分析[J].世界经济研究,2007(3):63-68.
作者姓名:田素华
作者单位:复旦大学世界经济研究所
基金项目:上海市社会科学基金;复旦大学世界经济学科面向21世纪教育振兴行动计划(985计划)
摘    要:以行业数据为基础的分析结果表明,外资对上海的直接技术进步效应大于外资对上海本地企业的技术溢出效应,而外资对上海本地企业的技术溢出效应大小又与外资进入的行业有关。分不同外资来源的分析结果表明,港澳台投资对上海的直接技术进步效应小于对上海本地企业的技术溢出效应,OECD投资对上海的直接技术进步效应大于对上海本地企业的技术溢出效应。从上海经验出发,我们认为,我国必须根据外资对我国本地企业的正向技术溢出效应大小,甄别和遴选外资来源、流入形式和进入行业,在若干难以明显获得外资正向技术溢出效应的领域,采用内资替代外资的投资政策,以增加我国资本要素的投资收益,减少GDP与GNP之间的差距,降低经济增长过程中的福利漏出。

关 键 词:外商直接投资  技术进步效应  外资进入行业  外资来源
文章编号:1007-6964[2007]03-061009-0901

FDI Effects on China's Technology Development: A Structural Analysis based on the Case of Shanghai
Tian Suhua.FDI Effects on China''''s Technology Development: A Structural Analysis based on the Case of Shanghai[J].World Economy Study,2007(3):63-68.
Authors:Tian Suhua
Abstract:On the basis of sectors data, it has been found that the direct effects of FDI on Shanghai′s TFP development are stronger than the effects of FDI technology spillovers on Shanghai′s local enterprises. If we classify FDI into OECD′s and HTM′s based on the sources of FDI, it has been found that the direct effects on Shanghai′s TFP development of FDI from HTM are weaker than the effects of its technology spillovers on Shanghai′s local enterprises, but the direct effects of FDI from OECD compared with the effects of its technology spillovers are in the opposite way. The above results suggest that China should select the structure of FDI source, inflow mode and inflow sectors according to its TFP effects on China′s local enterprises.
Keywords:
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号