首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


China’s Agricultural Policy Transition: Impacts of Recent Reforms and Future Scenarios
Authors:Wusheng Yu  Hans G Jensen
Institution:Wusheng Yu and Hans G. Jensen are, respectively, Associate Professor and Researcher with the Institute of Food and Resource Economics, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Rolighedsvej 25, 1958 Frederiksberg C, Denmark. E‐mail: for correspondence. An earlier version of the paper was first presented at the 2007 IATRC Summer Symposium in Beijing. We thank Jikun Huang, Zhigang Xu, Jun Yang, Funing Zhong, two anonymous referees, and the editor for valuable comments and suggestions. Partial financial support through the project New Issues in Agricultural, Food and Bio‐energy Trade (Small and Medium‐scale Focused Research Project, Grant Agreement no. 212036), funded by the European Commission, is acknowledged.
Abstract:This article reviews recent developments in China’s agricultural domestic support policy, especially the transition from taxing farmers and agriculture to providing direct subsidies to grain production and purchased inputs. A model‐based quantitative analysis on the effects of these policy changes is presented. Simulation results suggest that recent policy changes have achieved the declared policy goals of increasing grain production and boosting farm income. Much of the increase in grain production and farm income can be attributed to higher per unit return to arable land, land reallocation to grain production and extra agricultural employment triggered by the policy changes. Based on the assumption that China’s public assistance to agriculture and farmers will continue and rise, two hypothetical future scenarios are simulated. Using all the support permitted under WTO de minimis limits with existing instruments, China’s policy will increase grain production, change trade patterns seemingly contrary to China’s comparative advantage, increase rural employment and significantly increase farm income (by more than 12%). If, however, decoupled instruments are applied to raise China’s agricultural domestic support to the same level, China’s agricultural production and trade will remain unchanged, rural employment remain stable, but farm income will be increased by nearly 15%.
Keywords:Agricultural taxes and subsidies  CGE model  China  domestic support  WTO  C68  F13  O53  Q18
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号