首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Land‐use change trajectories up to 2050: insights from a global agro‐economic model comparison
Authors:Christoph Schmitz  Hans van Meijl  Page Kyle  Gerald C Nelson  Shinichiro Fujimori  Angelo Gurgel  Petr Havlik  Edwina Heyhoe  Daniel Mason d'Croz  Alexander Popp  Ron Sands  Andrzej Tabeau  Dominique van der Mensbrugghe  Martin von Lampe  Marshall Wise  Elodie Blanc  Tomoko Hasegawa  Aikaterini Kavallari  Hugo Valin
Institution:1. Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK), , Telegrafenberg A 31, 14473 Potsdam Germany;2. Agricultural Economics Research Institute (LEI), Wageningen University and Research Centre, 2585 DB, The Hague, , The Netherlands;3. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL), 5825 University Research Court, Suite 3500 College Park, , MD 20740, USA;4. International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), , 2033 K St., NW Washington, DC, 20006‐1002, USA;5. University of Illinois, Urbana‐Champaign, Champaign, , IL 61801, USA;6. National Institute for Environmental Studies (NIES), , 16‐2 Onogawa Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305‐8506, Japan;7. Sao Paulo School of Economics (EESP‐FGV), , 01332‐000 Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil;8. International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA), , Schlossplatz 1, A‐2361 Laxenburg, Austria;9. Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics and Sciences (ABARES), , 18 Marcus Clarke Street Canberra ACT 2601, Australia;10. Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), , 1400 Independence Ave. SW, Mailstop 1800, Washington, DC 20250, USA;11. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), Viale delle Terme di Caracalla, , Roma, 00153 Italy;12. Organisation for Economic Co‐operation and Development (OECD), , 2, rue André Pascal 75775 Paris, Cedex 16, France;13. Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, , 77 Massachusetts Ave. Cambridge, MA, 02139‐4307, USA
Abstract:Changes in agricultural land use have important implications for environmental services. Previous studies of agricultural land‐use futures have been published indicating large uncertainty due to different model assumptions and methodologies. In this article we present a first comprehensive comparison of global agro‐economic models that have harmonized drivers of population, GDP, and biophysical yields. The comparison allows us to ask two research questions: (1) How much cropland will be used under different socioeconomic and climate change scenarios? (2) How can differences in model results be explained? The comparison includes four partial and six general equilibrium models that differ in how they model land supply and amount of potentially available land. We analyze results of two different socioeconomic scenarios and three climate scenarios (one with constant climate). Most models (7 out of 10) project an increase of cropland of 10–25% by 2050 compared to 2005 (under constant climate), but one model projects a decrease. Pasture land expands in some models, which increase the treat on natural vegetation further. Across all models most of the cropland expansion takes place in South America and sub‐Saharan Africa. In general, the strongest differences in model results are related to differences in the costs of land expansion, the endogenous productivity responses, and the assumptions about potential cropland.
Keywords:C61  C68  Q11  Q54  Land‐use change  Model intercomparison  Land‐use models  Land expansion
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号