首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


The estimation of long term impacts of China's key priority forestry programs on rural household incomes
Institution:1. National School of Development, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China;2. 1930 South Broadway, Grand Junction, CO 81507, USA;1. 203 Anheuser-Busch Natural Resources Bldg. Department of Forestry, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211, USA;2. USDA Forest Service, 160 Holdsworth Way, Amherst, MA 01003, USA;1. School of Economics and Finance, Xi''an Jiaotong University, Xi''an, Shaanxi 710061, China;2. School of Forestry and Wildlife Sciences, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849, United States;3. Research Center for Resource Economics and Environment Management, College of Economics and Management, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Shaanxi 712100, China;4. China National Forestry Economics and Development Research Center, Beijing 100714, China
Abstract:We use a large unique household panel dataset spanning 16 years to estimate the impacts of three Key Priority Forestry Programs (the KPFPs) in China on household incomes. The programs are the most significant of China's forest policies namely the Sloping Land Conversion Program (the SLCP), the Natural Forest Protection Program (the NFPP), and the Desertification Combating Program around Beijing and Tianjin (the DCBT). A fixed effect model with clustered standard errors is used to identify programs’ impacts based on variation in participation across households and time. In addition to estimating the total impacts of these programs, individually and in combination, we disaggregate the effects by income source, stage of policy implementation, and duration of participation. Overall, the impacts of the KPFPs on rural households’ income vary with time of enrollment and policy stage. We observe that the KPFPs in their initial stages of implementation, and for the early years of household participation, had negative, or at best neutral impacts on household incomes, in particular incomes from land. However, the later stages of the SLCP and the DCBT have tended to raise land-based incomes, and the NFPP has ceased to have a negative effect. This is likely to be in part the result of adjustments made by rural households over time in response to changes in the programs, as well as in market and environmental conditions.
Keywords:Priority forestry programs  Rural households’ income  Rural development  Forest economics  Ecological restoration  China  D1  14C  92R  Q
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号