首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Rural household incomes and land grabbing in Cambodia
Institution:1. Laboratoire PRODIG CNRS – UMR 8586, 2 rue Valette, 75005 Paris, France;2. AgroParisTech, Université Paris-Saclay, UFR Agriculture Comparée et Développement Agricole, Laboratoire PRODIG (UMR 8586), 16 rue Claude Bernard, 75005 Paris, France,;1. Holborn Gate, 26 Southhampton Buildings, WC2A 1AH London, United Kingdom;2. University of Waterloo 200 University Avenue West Waterloo, Ontario N2L 3G1, Canada;1. World Bank, NW Washington, DC, USA;2. University of International Business and Economics, Beijing, China;1. University of Bonn (ZEF), Germany;2. International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD), Rome;3. Ethiopian Economic Policy Research Institute, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia;1. Environmental Geography Group, Institute for Environmental Studies & Department of Earth Sciences, Faculty of Sciences, VU University Amsterdam, the Netherlands;2. Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research (WSL), Zürcherstrasse 111, CH-8903 Birmensdorf, Switzerland
Abstract:This paper empirically quantifies environmentally augmented rural household incomes in Cambodia and analyzes how economic land concessions (ELCs) affect such incomes. Data is derived from a structured survey of 600 randomly selected households in 15 villages in three study sites in Cambodia, where local livelihoods are highly reliant on access to land and natural resources, supported by qualitative data from focus group discussions. Gini coefficient decomposition, multiple regression models, and propensity score matching (PSM) models were employed to analyze the composition of income portfolios, determinants of major income sources, and the impacts of land grabbing on incomes. Results documented high reliance on environmental income (32–35% of total household income) and farm income (51–53%) across income quartiles; demonstrated the variation in product composition across quartiles and the contribution of each major product to income inequality; and identified the main household characteristics influencing absolute and relative incomes. ELCs were found to consistently have negative impacts on household total income, environmental income, size of available cultivable land and livestock holdings, and increasing the distance to forests. The total household annual income subjects to ELCs were estimated to decrease by 15–19%. While providing some employment opportunities, we find no evidence of positive income effects of ELCs on households in the areas where ELCs are located.
Keywords:Environmental income  Environmental reliance  Income inequality  Land concessions  South-east Asia
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号