Combining Sources of Preference Data for Modeling Complex Decision Processes |
| |
Authors: | Jordan J. Louviere Robert J. Meyer David S. Bunch Richard Carson Benedict Dellaert W. Michael Hanemann David Hensher Julie Irwin |
| |
Affiliation: | (1) Faculty of Economics, University of Sydney, Australia;(2) Wharton School of Business, University of Pennsylvania, USA;(3) Graduate School of Management, University of California, Davis;(4) Department of Economics, University of California, San Diego;(5) Center for Economic Research, Tilburg University, Netherlands;(6) Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of California, Berkeley;(7) Faculty of Economics, University of Sydney, Australia;(8) Wharton School of Business, University of Pennsylvania, USA |
| |
Abstract: | ![]() We review current state-of-the-art practices for combining preference data from multiple sources and discuss future research possibilities. A central theme is that any one data source (e.g., a scanner panel source) is often insufficient to support tests of complex theories of choice and decision making. Hence, analysts may need to embrace a wider variety of data types and measurement tools than traditionally have been considered in applied decision making and choice research. We discuss the viability of preference-stationarity assumptions usually made when pooling data, as well as random-utility theory-based approaches for combining data sources. We also discuss types of models and data sources likely to be required to make inferences about and estimate models that describe choice dynamics. The latter discussion is speculative insofar as the body of literature on this topic is small. |
| |
Keywords: | Choice modeling started preference data data pooling context effects choice dynamics |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|