首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Capital expenditure announcements and anti-takeover barriers
Institution:1. Programa de Pós-Graduação em Engenharia Química (PPGEQ), Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU), Avenida João Naves de Ávila, 2121, 38408-100 Uberlândia, Minas Gerais, Brazil;2. Centro de Estudos de Gestão do Instituto Superior Técnico (CEG-IST), Universidade de Lisboa (UL), Avenida Rovisco Pais 1049-001 Lisboa, Portugal;1. US Securities and Exchange Commission, Division of Economic and Risk Analysis, Washington, DC 20549, USA;2. Lundquist College of Business, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403, USA;3. School of Law, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA
Abstract:In this paper, we compare capital budget announcements by firms with anti-takeover mechanisms in place to announcements by firms without takeover barriers during the period 1980 to 1995. We find that anti-takeover provisions do not affect investors’ average reactions to investment choices. Market responses are heterogeneous; however, and differ according to size, growth opportunity, the availability of free cash flow and exposure to the capital markets. We find evidence consistent with managerial entrenchment when firms are insulated from the threat of takeover and have enough free cash flow to avoid raising external capital. We also find that for small firms, the reaction to capital investment announcements are positively related to free cash flow when managers have high growth opportunities, but negatively related when investment opportunity is small. This result is consistent with Noe (1988), who shows that restricting managers’ investment choices to positive NPV projects is necessary to obtain the pecking order results of Myers and Majluf (1984).
Keywords:
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号