首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Instructional case: Rock Star Promotions,Inc.
Affiliation:1. University of Alabama at Birmingham, Collat School of Business, Accounting & Finance Department, 1150 10th Ave S, Birmingham, AL 35205, United States;2. California Polytechnic State University, Orfalea College of Business, Department of Accounting, 1 Grand Ave, San Luis Obispo, CA 93407, United States;1. Department of Accounting & Law, University at Albany – SUNY, 1400 Washington Avenue, Albany, NY 12222, United States;2. Department of Accounting, Albers School of Business and Economics, Seattle University, 901 12th Avenue, Seattle, WA 98122, United States;3. D''Amore-McKim School of Business, Northeastern University, 360 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, United States;1. Poole College of Management, North Carolina State University, Campus Box 2779, 2801 Founders Drive, Raleigh, NC 27695, United States;2. Department of Statistics at North Carolina State University, Campus Box 8203, Raleigh, NC 27695-8203, United States;4. Poole College of Management, NC State University, Office of Undergraduate Programs, Nelson Hall 2176, 2801 Founders Drive, Raleigh, NC 27695, United States
Abstract:Rock Star Promotions, Inc. is an instructional case that incorporates both auditing and legal concepts. The objectives are five-fold. The first objective is to raise the issue of client acceptance procedures. The second objective is to examine the effect of special engagements on the assessment of audit risk under GAAS. The third objective is to expose students to the difficulties associated with the concept of independence in a real-world situation. The fourth objective is to examine the evidence gathering process and evaluate the persuasiveness of alternative types of evidence. Finally, the fifth objective is to increase student awareness and knowledge of the issues surrounding the current “litigation crisis” and the related legal liability for auditors.This case summary is based on the fact situation in the case of Hagen Sign Corp. v. KDI Corp. (In re KDI Corp.), 2 B.R. 503 (Bankr. S.D. Ohio 1980). Overall, the facts presented in this case represent original litigation filed against a CPA firm and are used to illustrate the complex operating environment faced by the audit profession.
Keywords:
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号