|
|||||
|
|
| WTO内“潜在利益”的保护:一种新的贸易干涉工具 | |
| 引用本文： | 宋杰. WTO内“潜在利益”的保护:一种新的贸易干涉工具[J]. 国际贸易问题, 2009, 0(11) |
| 作者姓名： | 宋杰 |
| 作者单位： | 浙江工商大学法学院; |
| 基金项目： | 国家社科基金项目“国际法中普遍性法律利益的保护问题研究”项目(项目号:08BFX075); 浙江工商大学青年人才基金项目(项目号:Q09-16)的阶段性成果之一 |
| 摘 要： | 在美国投诉欧共体"香蕉贸易体制案"中,专家组和上诉机构均支持了美国基于"潜在利益"所享有的"投诉资格"。联合国秘书长将此案作为WTO援引国家责任条款草案第42条和第48条的例证。在此背景基础上,考虑到国家基于某些WTO协议所承担的义务具有"对一切"的性质,以及WTO内既存"非违法之诉"的事实,"潜在利益"有被用作贸易干涉工具的可能性。作为贸易干涉工具的"潜在利益",既有利于促进国家更好地履行WTO义务,也可能被贸易强国用作扩张自身利益的工具。 |
| 关 键 词： | 潜在利益 国家责任条款草案 非违法之诉 TRIPS协议 贸易干涉工具 |
Potential Interest Protection in WTO System: a New Trade Intervening Instrument |
|
| SONG Jie. Potential Interest Protection in WTO System: a New Trade Intervening Instrument[J]. Journal of International Trade, 2009, 0(11) | |
| Authors: | SONG Jie |
| Abstract: | In the European Communities, Regime for the Importation, Sale and Distribution of Bananas case, both the Panel and the Appellate Body support the claims put forward by the United State based on potential interest. In the Report of the Secretary-General of UN, i.e. Responsibility of States for internationally wrongful acts Compilation of decisions of international courts, tribunals and other bodies, this case is cited as the evidence of WTO invocating article 42 and article 48 of Draft Articles on State Resp... |
| Keywords: | Potential interest Draft Articles on State Responsibility Non-violation complaint TRIPS Trade intervening instrument |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录！ | |