Portfolio selection subject to experts' judgments |
| |
Authors: | K. Smimou C.R. Bector |
| |
Affiliation: | a Faculty of Business & IT, University of Ontario Institute of Technology (UOIT), Oshawa, Ontario, Canada L1H 7K4 b Department of Business Administration, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada R3T-5V4 c Department of Accounting and Finance, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada R3T-5V4 |
| |
Abstract: | Since Markowitz [Markowitz, H. M. (1952). Portfolio selection. The Journal of Finance, 7, 77-91.], mean-variance theory has assumed that risky-asset returns to be random variables. The theory deals with this uncertainty by further assuming that investors hold homogeneous beliefs regarding the probability distribution governing return uncertainty. While the theory deals with return uncertainty, it fails to address measurement imprecision. In his original work, Markowitz recognized the need to combine randomness with heterogeneous expert judgment resulting in such imprecision. The main objective contributions of the paper are (i) to explore the implications of fuzzy return indeterminacy on mean-variance optimal portfolio choice, (ii) to use bid-ask spread as a proxy measure of the indeterminacy or “fuzzy” nature of random returns, and (iii) to introduce a brief, self-contained glimpse of empirical representations to practitioners unfamiliar with the fuzzy modeling field. Exposition, such as this one, is expected to open new collaborations between other branches of fuzzy mathematics and asset-pricing theories. |
| |
Keywords: | G11 G12 G15 C61 |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|