Retail investors exonerated: the case of the January effect |
| |
| Authors: | Julia Henker Debapriya J. Paul |
| |
| Affiliation: | 1. Department of Finance, School of Business, Bond University, Queensland, Australia;2. School of Banking and Finance, University of New South Wales (UNSW), Sydney, Australia |
| |
| Abstract: | We dispel the belief that the January effect is due to retail investor trading. Previous studies suggest that retail investors, affected by behavioural biases and disproportionally invested in small capitalization stocks, are the source of the January effect. Furthermore, the literature regards retail investor trading and the tax‐loss selling hypothesis as essentially the same explanation. We separate tax implications and market capitalization to show that retail traders are not the cause of the January effect. Our study is an important direct test of whether retail trading causes market anomalies. |
| |
| Keywords: | Anomaly Behavioural finance January effect Market efficiency Retail investors G14 |
|
|
