首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Bargaining rationale for cooperative generic advertising*
Authors:John M. Crespi   Jennifer S. James
Affiliation:Department of Agricultural Economics, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506, USA;Department of Agribusiness, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, CA 93407, USA
Abstract:The beggar-thy-neighbour aspect of commodity advertising means that benefits to one commodity from advertising come at the expense of other commodities. The effect can be mitigated by cooperation among groups as shown by Alston, Freebairn and James (AFJ). A drawback to AFJ's analysis is that some cooperative outcomes require side payments from one producer group to another. This paper offers a bargaining solution as an alternative to cooperation in the case where cooperative side payments would be needed. We show that while bargaining without side payments is not as effective as cooperation at reducing beggar-thy-neighbour effects, it is a welfare improving alternative to non-cooperation and is likely more practical in many situations.
Keywords:cooperative and non-cooperative solutions    excessive advertising    mandated commodity promotion programs    Nash bargaining    US beef and pork
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号