首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Accounting Window Dressing and Template Regulation: A Case Study of the Australian Credit Union Industry
Authors:David Hillier  Allan Hodgson  Peta Stevenson-Clarke  Suntharee Lhaopadchan
Institution:(1) Leeds University Business School, Maurice Keyworth Building, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9PR, U.K.;(2) Amsterdam Business School, University of Amsterdam, Roetersstraat 11, Amsterdam, 1018 WB, The Netherlands;(3) Department of Accounting, Finance and Economics, Griffith University, Nathan, QLD 4111, Australia;(4) Faculty of Management Sciences, Kasetsart University, Chonburi, Thailand
Abstract:This article documents the response of cooperative institutions that were required to adhere to new capital adequacy regulations traditionally geared for profit-maximising organisations. Using data from the Australian credit union industry, we demonstrate that the cooperative philosophy and internal corporate governance structure of cooperatives will lead management to increase capital adequacy ratios through the application of accounting window dressing techniques. This is opposite to the intended purpose of template regulation aimed at efficiently increasing operating margins and lowering risk. Our results raise several debatable issues regarding the ethics of accounting management and the imposition of one-shoe-fits-all external regulation.
Keywords:cooperative stakeholder governance  capital adequacy regulation  accounting window dressing
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号