首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

先行支付制度法理分析
引用本文:张荣芳. 先行支付制度法理分析[J]. 社会保障研究, 2012, 0(6): 89-95
作者姓名:张荣芳
作者单位:武汉大学法学院,湖北武汉,430072
摘    要:
从社会保险法理看,社会保险基金对第三人侵权造成的保险损害承担保险给付义务,在履行保险给付义务之后,保险人依法获得保险代位权;工伤保险基金对未缴纳保险费的单位职工工伤损害承担保险赔偿责任.我国《社会保险法》确立的先行支付制度,否定相关社会保险基金在该情形下的保险赔偿义务.这不仅冲击了社会保险法理,也违背了社会保险法的基本原则,而且给司法实践造成一定困扰.明确相关保险基金先行支付义务和求偿权的实质,是该制度正常运用的基础.

关 键 词:第三人侵权  代位权  先行支付制度  社会保险基金

The Legal Analysis for Advance Payment System
ZHANG Rongfang. The Legal Analysis for Advance Payment System[J]. Social Security Studies, 2012, 0(6): 89-95
Authors:ZHANG Rongfang
Affiliation:ZHANG Rongfang
Abstract:
From the legal principle of social insurance, social insurance fund should bear the insurance payment obligations for the damage by a third party infringement. After pefformancing the insurance payment obligations, the insurer gain insurance subrogation; Fund of inductrial injury insurance should assume insurance responsibility for compensation for work injury damages of employees who do not pay insurance premiums. In China the Social Insurance Law has established advance payment system which denies the social insurance fund in the case of compensation obligations. This is not only the impact of the social insurance legal, but also violate the basic principles of the Social Insurance Law, and cause some trouble to the judicial practice. The Social Insurance Law should clear the essence of related to insurance fund paid in advance obligations and claims, it is the basis of normal use of the system.
Keywords:the third person tort   right of subrogation   the advance payment system   social insurance fund
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号