首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Tax planning,corporate governance and equity value
Authors:Nor Shaipah Abdul Wahab  Kevin Holland
Institution:1. Department of Accounting, Ming-Chuan University, 250 Sec. 5, Zhong Shan N. Road, Taipei 111, Taiwan;2. Department of Accounting, Labovitz School of Business and Economics, University of Minnesota Duluth, 1318 Kirby Drive, Duluth, MN 55812, United States;3. Department of Accounting, National Taiwan University, No. 1, Sec. 4, Roosevelt Road, Taipei 106, Taiwan;1. Department of Political and Economic Studies, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland;2. Aalto University School of Business, Department of Economics, Helsinki, Finland;3. School of Management, University of Tampere, FIN 33014, Finland;1. University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Germany;2. CESifo, Germany
Abstract:Tax planning by firms is a highly significant activity. After audit fees, tax related services are the largest source of fee income for UK accounting firms. When viewed in terms of its impact, tax planning is the major source of the corporation tax gap amongst large firms (HMRC, 2010). Although traditionally tax planning has been viewed as benefiting shareholders via increased after tax earnings, more recently the underlying motivation has been questioned. Desai and Dharmapala (2006) argue that when an information asymmetry exists between managers and shareholders with respect to tax planning, it can facilitate managers acting in their own interests resulting in a negative association between tax planning and firm value. Using a sample of UK quoted firms from 2005 to 2007 and data drawn from International Accounting Standard 12 Income Taxes (IASB, 2010) Effective Tax Rate (ETR) reconciliations, this paper reports such a negative relationship. Further, the relationship is robust to the inclusion of corporate governance measures which could be expected to moderate the potential implications of a tax related shareholder–manager information asymmetry. An innovation of this paper is in using the ETR reconciliations to examine sub-categories of tax planning activities. The paper contributes to the debate of who determines, and benefits from tax planning conducted by firms. Its findings have direct policy relevance for shareholders and tax administrations in monitoring and controlling firms’ tax planning activities.
Keywords:
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号