Tangibility and investment irreversibility in asset pricing |
| |
Authors: | Paul Docherty Howard Chan Steve Easton |
| |
Institution: | 1. Newcastle Business School, The University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia;2. Department of Finance, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia |
| |
Abstract: | Zhang (2005) and Cooper (2006) provide a theoretical risk‐based explanation for the value premium by suggesting a nexus between firms’ book‐to‐market ratio and investment irreversibility. They argue that unproductive physical capacity is costly in contracting conditions but provides growth opportunities during economic expansions, resulting in covariant risk between firms’ investment in tangible assets and market‐wide returns. This article uses the Australian accounting environment to empirically test this theory – a test that is not possible using US data. Consistent with the theoretical argument, tangibility is priced in equity returns, and augmenting the Fama and French three‐factor model with a tangibility factor increases model explanatory power. |
| |
Keywords: | Asset pricing Tangibility of assets Investment irreversibility Fama– French model G12 G14 |
|
|