An examination into the effectiveness of two-sided comparative price appeals |
| |
Authors: | Michael A. Kamins Lawrence J. Marks |
| |
Affiliation: | (1) University of Southern California, California, USA;(2) Kent State University, Kent, USA |
| |
Abstract: | This study extended previous research in the two-sided comparative area by considering such a strategy from a price disclaimer perspective. The effectiveness in usage of a two-sided comparative price appeal relative to a one-sided counterpart across increasing levels of savings between the sponsor’s average price for a supermarket basket of goods and that of the average competitor was considered. In general, the findings of the study were consistent with previous research involving comparative two-sided appeals. That is, the two-sided advertisement was found to be significantly more believable than its one-sided counterpart. However, this result was found to have little impact upon purchase intention. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|