首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Engaging Australian small-scale lifestyle landowners in natural resource management programmes – Perceptions,past experiences and policy implications
Institution:1. Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran;2. Department of Aerospace, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran;3. Cartographic and Topographic, Polytechnic University of Valencia. Valencia, Spain;4. Department of Soil Science Engineering, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran;5. Department of Economics and Social Sciences, Polytechnic University of Valencia, Alicante, Spain;6. Geo-Environmental Research Group, University of Extremadura, 10071 Cáceres, Spain;7. Soil Erosion and Degradation Research Group (SEDER), University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
Abstract:This study explores Australian small-scale rural lifestyle landowners’ perceptions of and experiences with natural resource management (NRM) extension and incentive programmes and discusses means to better-match such programmes to these landowners’ NRM interests, assistance needs and delivery preferences. Data was collected from seventeen in-depth qualitative case-studies of small-acreage landholders located in the Noosa hinterland in south-east Queensland. These landholders indicated a high need for expert advice, labour and other resource assistance to achieve their property management objectives. They had, however, a low-level of awareness and understanding of available programmes (particularly incentive schemes) that could provide some of their needed support. Other key barriers to the landholders’ participation in these programmes were aversions to support providers, a perceived unsuitability of properties or irrelevance of particular incentive programmes, and concerns about programme application procedures or property-rights and value-related implications of engagement. Increased NRM engagement among small-scale lifestyle landowners may be achievable through amendments to existing support programmes and better communication of these programmes. The design and delivery of appropriate measures and messages may require collaborative partnerships, with knowledgeable and influential ‘go-to’ landowners and peer-mentoring networks playing a critical role. In many cases, conservation-focused incentive programmes may need to facilitate cooperative NRM among groups of adjoining micro-scale lifestyle landowners and allow greater flexibility in the length and allowable land and forest management practices of contractual agreements. Moreover, small-scale lifestyle landowners have much interest in and need for support to integrate multi-purpose agroforestry systems with other environmental and aesthetic property management goals. Workshops, follow-up field-days on participating properties, free one-on-one on-property advice, and NRM guides that include detailed case-study accounts of landowner experiences are important means of communicating the availability, administrative requirements and benefits of support programmes to small-scale lifestyle landowners.
Keywords:Amenity landscapes  Incentive programmes  Forest management  Multi-purpose agroforestry  Qualitative research  Small-acreage landowners
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号