首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

欧盟和美国的农业生态补偿政策及启示
引用本文:陈诗华,王玥,王洪良,香宝.欧盟和美国的农业生态补偿政策及启示[J].中国农业资源与区划,2022,43(1):10-17.
作者姓名:陈诗华  王玥  王洪良  香宝
作者单位:1.中国环境科学研究院环境基准与风险评估国家重点实验室,北京 100012;2.天津市滨海新区环境创新研究院,天津 300450
基金项目:国家社会科学基金重大项目“生态补偿与乡村绿色发展协同推进体制机制与政策体系研究”(18ZDA048);科技部“第二次青藏高原综合科学考察研究”(2019QZKK0608)
摘    要:目的 欧盟和美国是世界上农业生态补偿政策体系较完善、实践丰富的地区,在农业生态保护上取得了积极的成效,其制度安排对于完善我国农业生态补偿制度具有重要借鉴意义。方法 文章采用文献分析法和对比归纳法,从政策目标、政策工具和法律保障三个方面比较分析了欧盟和美国现行的农业生态补偿政策及特征,并针对我国农业生态补偿模式的不足提出了若干完善我国农业生态补偿制度的建议。结果 欧盟和美国在政策中广泛采取正向激励的政策工具,依靠完备的法律体系建立起高度市场化的农业生态补偿模式,但在政策保障和管理评估上投入巨大,正在寻求更具成本效益的补偿方案。结论 我国的农业生态补偿存在政策碎片化、市场机制保障和农民参与度不足的问题,建议借鉴欧盟和美国农业生态补偿制度中协调农业和环境政策、完善绿色金融体系和提升政策透明度的做法来改善。

关 键 词:农业生态补偿  欧盟  美国  国际经验  制度设计
收稿时间:2021/9/9 0:00:00

AGRICULTURAL ECO-COMPENSATION POLICY OF THE EU AND THE UNITED STATES: REVELATION TO CHINA
Chen Shihu,Wang Yue,Wang Hongliang,Xiang Bao.AGRICULTURAL ECO-COMPENSATION POLICY OF THE EU AND THE UNITED STATES: REVELATION TO CHINA[J].Journal of China Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning,2022,43(1):10-17.
Authors:Chen Shihu  Wang Yue  Wang Hongliang  Xiang Bao
Institution:1.State Key Laboratory of Environmental Criteria and Risk Assessment, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China;2.Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences Tianjin Branch, Tianjin 300450, China
Abstract:The European Union and the United States have highly complete and practical agricultural eco-compensation policy systems, which have led to various positive results in their practice of agricultural environmental protection. This may significantly inform the improvement of the agricultural eco-compensation policy system in China. The current paper presented an analysis of relevant literature and adopted the comparative induction method in comparing the latest agricultural eco-compensation policies in the EU and the U.S. from three perspectives, namely policy rationale, policy instruments and legal regulations. Then it proposed some suggestions for the establishment of a Chinese agricultural eco-compensation policy system by targeting the weak points in the existing plan. The results were listed as follows. The EU and the U.S. had widely practiced positive incentive policy instruments, which relied on complete legal systems to ensure the smooth operation of the highly market-oriented mechanism. In the meantime, however, the two were also facing the problem of huge investments in both policy guarantees and management evaluation, which drove them to seek for more cost-effective compensation schemata. The conclusions are showed as follows. Nonetheless, such measures as integrating agricultural and environmental policies, strengthening green financial and enhancing policy openness adopted by the EU and the U.S still shed some lights on tackling the insufficiency in systematization, guarantee of market mechanisms and farmer participation in the Chinese agricultural eco-compensation policy system.
Keywords:agricultural eco-compensation  European Union  United States  international experience  policy design
点击此处可从《中国农业资源与区划》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《中国农业资源与区划》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号