Ulrich Beck: exploring and contesting risk |
| |
Authors: | Mads P Sørensen |
| |
Institution: | 1. Department of Political Science, Danish Centre for Studies in Research and Research Policy (CFA), Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmarkmps@ps.au.dk |
| |
Abstract: | AbstractWhile risk research normally understands risk as an entity that can be calculated using statistics and probabilities – and which therefore also can become the object of insurance technology – it is the production of new, non-calculable risks and therefore also risks that cannot be insured against, which is at the centre of Ulrich Beck’s risk society theory. The article examines Beck’s conceptualization of risk and discusses how he has clarified and further refined the concept since publishing Risk Society in 1986. The article shows, first, how Beck understands risk as an entity that is neither danger nor risk in the traditional sense but rather something in between, which he refers to as ‘man-made disasters’ and ‘new risks’. The discussion then addresses Beck’s position in relation to the ontological status of risk, which is an intermediate position between realism and constructivism. The non-calculability and non-insurability of the new risks are also examined. The article discusses what it means that the new risks are not visible and the significance of non-knowledge for how we understand them. Finally, the new conditions of existence for politics, states and individuals are outlined in the aftermath of Beck’s risk society theory. The article concludes with a discussion of the analytical potential of the theory. |
| |
Keywords: | Ulrich Beck risk risk society non-knowledge second modernity |
|
|