Foreign owners and American cement: Old cartel hands,or new kids on the block?

In 1961, all portland cement producing capacity in the United States was owned by companies domiciled here. Thirty years later, about 70% was controlled by foreign owners, mostly European. It has been suggested by various authorities — academic economists, the business press, even cement executives — that foreign governments' tolerance for formal or tacit collusion would bring the American cement industry a kind of ‘price discipline’ that it has been largely unable to practice since 1948. This contention is tested as an hypothesis, using regional data from the U.S. Bureau of Mines and the Portland Cement Association. The test shows either no or a negative relation between foreign control and the level of regional cement prices. At the same time, we observe the traditional positive relation between concentration (HHI) and prices. The results imply that horizontal mergers between cement producers are a better subject for the attention of public policy than where they are owned.