Reprisal, retribution and requital: Investigating customer retaliation |
| |
Authors: | Venessa Funches Lenita Davis |
| |
Affiliation: | a PO Box 244023, Auburn Montgomery, Montgomery, AL 36124, United States b PO Box 870225, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487, United States c 132 Alston Hall, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487, United States |
| |
Abstract: | Customers, regardless of context or culture, will go to any extreme to retaliate against an offending service provider. Retaliation is an action taken in return for an injury or offense [Huefner, J.C. and H.K. Hunt, “Consumer retaliation as a response to dissatisfaction,” J Consum Satisf Dissatisfaction Complaining Behav, (2000); 13, 61-82.]. To date, research has had only a limited discussion of customer's use of anti-consumption behaviors as an expression of retaliation. This study uses qualitative methods to demonstrate that the motivations for retaliation extend beyond simply “getting even,” customers retaliate to teach the service provider a lesson or to save others from the same fate. The research identifies specific roles taken by customers as they retaliate, the emotions of customers and store issues that are at the root of these behaviors. In addition, the authors categorize a range of retaliatory behaviors as follows: cost/loss; consumption prevention; voice, exit and betrayal; and boycotting. |
| |
Keywords: | Retaliation Qualitative methods Personal interviews Customer behavior Anti-consumption |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|